No you won’t. You’ll simply have eliminated a set of options from a myriad of choices that are in front of you. The only result from this strategy will be the continued infusion of frustration and confusion into the minds of your team as they try to hit some goal that no one knows exists, not even you. People who are “busy” use this term to great extent as a smokescreen to what they are…

There is a lot written about whether you should play the game or the player you are playing against. You see it in many sports games, where a player realizes the instant that they can’t win the game, so they start playing the player. Here’s the thing, when you play the player, you are no longer playing the game, you’re playing something else completely different, but it’s not the game. If you can’t beat them…

However implemented, it’s a rule to enforce that one team does not lose by a substantial amount to another team. I’ve seen this implemented over the years in fashion. The worst way I have seen it implemented is when the team with the larger score, takes members of their team off the field. Why is this the wrong way? Invariably, the mismatch is not by numbers but by skill so there is a good chance…

Meet with your team. Spend an hour with each person. Get to know them. Understand what makes them produce all the great work that they do. Understand what ticks them off. Rinse and Repeat with every person on your team. Once you’ve done that, come up with a plan that addresses their weaknesses and leverages their strengths. If you have yet to do this, do it now. It’s not a question of you should be…